Jump to content

Sonar 3 vs Samplitude Producer 2496


cyrral
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just being curious, I decided to check the system CPU and Disk access performance and compare Sonar's and Samplitude's audio engine effeciency using the exact same wave files.

Scenario:

P4 2.8 HT

2GB RAM

160GB S-ATA HD

Tascam FW-1884 Firewire interface

ATI X300E Dual monitor video

(26) 24bit/48k audio wave tracks

Sonitus compressor and reverb (just on vocals, keeping it simple)

Cakewalk Sonar 3.0------------------------ CPU 19%, Disk 27%

Samplitude Producer 2496 (Version 6)- CPU 12%, Disk 11%

It's interesting to see how Samplitude utilizes the system far more efficiently than Sonar. And Sonar even supports Hyper Threading. :D

For what it's worth, I just thought I'd share this with the good folks on the forum. Especially since I'm still a newcomer to SAM. B)

LarryC

cyrral

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...